Protocol Comparison Analytics

LIVE

Cross-team performance breakdown by FIX · REST · WebSocket · IICPC 2026

Protocol
FIX8 teams

Avg P99

3.82ms

Avg TPS

58.2k

Avg Corr

96.4%

Top performerNullPointerException
REST9 teams

Avg P99

4.91ms

Avg TPS

51.7k

Avg Corr

95.8%

Top performerQuantumEdge
WS7 teams

Avg P99

5.34ms

Avg TPS

48.3k

Avg Corr

95.1%

Top performerQuantumEdge

Score Breakdown by Protocol

Top 8 teams · Speed · Stability · Accuracy per protocol

Performance Heatmap

All teams × all metrics × all protocols · Color intensity = performance tier

ExcellentGoodFairPoor
TEAMP99 LATENCY (ms)MAX TPSCORRECTNESS %
FIXRESTWSFIXRESTWSFIXRESTWS
1

QuantumEdge

Rust
1.2ms1.4ms1.2ms92k80k86k99.7%99.2%99.5%
2

NullPointerException

C++
1.0ms1.2ms1.1ms97k85k90k98.1%97.6%97.9%
3

AlphaSignal

Go
2.1ms2.4ms2.2ms75k66k70k98.9%98.4%98.7%
4

ByteForge

Rust
2.7ms3.2ms2.9ms72k63k68k97.5%97.0%97.3%
5

OrderFlux

C++
3.2ms3.8ms3.4ms66k58k62k97.2%96.7%97.0%
6

MatchEngine9

Go
3.8ms4.4ms4.0ms62k54k58k96.4%95.9%96.2%
7

CryptoArb

Rust
5.1ms5.9ms5.4ms55k48k51k96.0%95.5%95.8%
8

TurboBook

C++
5.8ms6.7ms6.1ms50k44k47k94.6%94.1%94.4%
9

NanosecHFT

C++
7.1ms8.2ms7.4ms45k40k42k94.1%93.6%93.9%
10

ZeroLatency

Go
8.5ms9.8ms8.9ms41k36k38k92.7%92.2%92.5%

Protocol Ranking

12 teams

Sorted by composite score · All protocols

RANKTEAMLANGUAGEPROTOCOLSCOMPOSITEP99 LATMAX TPSCORRECTNESSUPTIME
1+1
QuantumEdge
Rust
FIXRESTWS
9471.24ms87.4k99.4%99.9%
2-1
NullPointerException
C++
FIXWS
9211.07ms92.1k97.8%99.7%
3—
AlphaSignal
Go
RESTWS
8892.18ms71.3k98.6%99.5%
4+1
ByteForge
Rust
FIXREST
8562.87ms68.9k97.2%99.1%
5-1
OrderFlux
C++
FIXRESTWS
8343.41ms63.2k96.9%98.8%
6+1
MatchEngine9
Go
WSREST
8124.02ms58.7k96.1%98.4%
7-1
CryptoArb
Rust
FIX
7875.38ms52.3k95.7%97.9%
8+1
TurboBook
C++
RESTWS
7616.12ms47.8k94.3%97.2%
9-1
NanosecHFT
C++
FIXWS
7387.44ms43.1k93.8%96.5%
10—
ZeroLatency
Go
REST
7128.91ms38.6k92.4%95.8%
11+1
PricePriority
Rust
FIXREST
68111.20ms31.4k91.1%94.3%
12-1
DeadReckon
Go
WS
42338.70ms12.8k74.2%71.3%